Відео

But didn’t the people holding the supposed oldest Bible in the world know it was the oldest Bible in the world all those years they were holding it? And they said nothing?

Complete Trash

There's absolutely no proof for what he's claiming here. There are far more manuscripts that have the longer reading in Mark's gospel.

It’s hard to believe that people are so gullible to believe that sianaticus is genuine.

There is no evidence that that this manuscript or the Vaticanus existed before the 15th century. It’s a fraud along with Vaticanus perpetrated by those who hate the KJV because of its doctrines that go against Rome.

The more you dig into the ancient manuscripts, the more you see the absolute, unmatched, & irrefutable integrity of the biblical text. If you're willing to see the truth, you'll understand that the Bible is the inerrant word of God.

The open space at the end of Mark ?

Notice the missing section at the end? Gee, I wonder how that happened 🧐 Discernment people!

read The Forging of Codex Sinaiticus

1.4K views 3 years ago Dan Wallace is NOT GUILTY of NAZI JEW KILLING SODOMITEISM

Fellas, the complete lack of charisma and knowledge oozes put of every thing you say. I hope Dan is doing well, this organization is done without him.

Dr. Wallace, thank you for following your passion to the Cross and adding clarity and beauty (and laughs!) to the embarrassment of riches. I will be sharing your work for years to come for as long as I can!!! God bless you and thank you!

Dr. Wallace for sure he's cherry-picking information he's chairing there's no way that he does not know how much of scripture that manuscript does not contain I am laughing it is a fake

Siniaticus is most certainly a fraud; there are too many points to list here which confirm this. As well as only it and Vaticanus omit the last 12 verses of Gospel of Mark.

Pure trash 😅

Sheer drivel mr Wallace. No good news gospel would end with the words " and they were afraid." This ms is so corrupt how can you be serious?

I have watched your longer talks on this topic and you explain this very well. And here again some spelling errors are to be expected as you mention but the over all meaning is not lost. One thing science or academia cannot find is the WISDOM that is inspired from GOD in these manuscripts. Some scientists have come to realize the ultimate truths though.❤

Thank you for your work! I am thankful that scholars like you are preserving and studying this important history.

Don't think I will ever be able to pronounce Homoioteleuton and Homoioarchton. 😀

Very clear explanation, guys. Thanks a lot for this free lesson 😂 cheers from Brazil 🇧🇷

Keep them coming brothers

Could write a book about all these stories! Always enjoy this type of information.

It would be good if the academic community would choose another word than “corruption” to describe a rather technical feature of manuscript reproduction.

How much difference is there between the two big early texts and the TR And is it true that the modern CT used those two early codexes primarily for their text ?

For I testify unto every man that heareth the words of the prophecy of this book, If any man shall add unto these things, God shall add unto him the plagues that are written in this book: And if any man shall take away from the words of the book of this prophecy, God shall take away his part out of the book of life, and out of the holy city, and from the things which are written in this book. He which testifieth these things saith, Surely I come quickly. Amen. Even so, come, Lord Jesus. The grace of our Lord Jesus Christ be with you all. Amen. Revelation 22:18-21

"Dr". Wallace is exceedingly incorrect!!... First off, Codex Sinaiticus has NEVER been properly scientifically chemically tested. Moreover... it is a well know historically documented FACT that Codex Sinaiticus as it is known, was actually created by Constantine Simonides in 1839 in Greece on the Mt. Athos peninsula. It was originally intended as a gift for Tzar Nicholas I of Russia. Additionally, the majority of Codex Sinaiticus was purposefully stained and darkened with lemon juice by Constantine Von Tischendorf to make it look older that it actually is.... Tischendorf Von Tischendorf was a well known con-artist and liar. The original folia pages of the Codex Frederico Augustanus, take from the Sinaiticus, as well as the sample that Uspensky took from Genesis, still remain (White) to this day.... while the rest of Codex Sinaiticus was fraudulently altered to try and make it look older than it actually is... Codex Sinaiticus as well as Codex Vaticanus are well documented forgeries!!... There are FAKE people. We have GOD's True Words persevered in the King James Bible, handed down to us from Antioch.

THE MOST FAKE AND CORRUPT GREEK TEXT!! WE HAVE RECORDS OF THE EARLY CHUCH FATHERS QUOTING THE FULL ENDING OF MARK'S GOSPEL...GOING BACK TO END OF FIRST CEN. THIS MAN IS A FALSE TEACHER! do research on Westtcott & Hort. THIS IS NOT THE OLDEST....

Raise the Dead... they certainly are with older manuscripts and the heart of scholars! They are doing an amazing job.

I absolutely LOVE hearing about the child's "graffiti" or doodles on the manuscript! Nothing humanizes those who went before than to hear stories like this. Thank you!

Fascinating work!!!!

What is the percentage of difference between the TR and the CT when it comes to meaningful variants in our NT?

✍ Why should we assume a handful of manuscripts as being more accurate than the mainstream of manuscripts preserved in the Church ie. Catholic/Eastern Catholic/Orthodox? What is the methodology of textual criticism? It seems to be a very secularized field.

Nice video. Concise & informative. This suggests the future of Bible studies. From scrolls to Codex/Book, to digital, i.e., Laptops/Tablets/Cellphones. Study-notes features are rapidly growing exponentially. Some websites combine over a dozen different study Bibles. Other websites include over 100 different translations of the Bible. Next generation Bible study. ✝📖😇💻🎓🎤

In 500 years time you'll be looked at the same way we look at the scribes and record keepers 500 years in the past.

And all those manuscripts belong 100% to Catholics and some Orthodox just a heads up

So cool!!

Dr. Wallace’s reasoning for the short ending of Mark is irrational. Weird!!

I think it is cool , I hope for new undiscovered ones 😊, I would love to dig up a new manuscript and something major biblically

I love the Orthodox monks singing. Music to my ears.

We plan on seeing it in a couple weeks. Amazing manuscript and story. Thanks for sharing.

Can everyone visit this library?

It seems strange that it was written in the fourth century but wouldn’t found until the nineteen century? Wishful thinking

I saw it when visiting the BL some years back. At the time I didn't know its background, nonetheless, I know it was an important document for us Christians. Today, I have learnt to appreciate and love such manuscripts due to Dr. Wallace videos and the CSNTM website. May God bless your ministry Dr. Wallace.

Awesome! :)

It looks like part of it was erased , is that true ?

keep up the great work!

Awesome Find and Great Work Dr Wallace! Love to hear about new manuscripts and variants etc 3 John 2 brother God Bless!

Double Awesome! :)

I’d come if I were closer!

Hello. Is it for free? I would like to join online.